Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework (2018)
Massachusetts' state-mandated educator evaluation framework organized around four standards aligned to the Massachusetts Professional Standards for Teachers. The framework uses a five-step evaluation cycle and rates teachers across four performance levels, with a strong emphasis on student and professional growth.
The Massachusetts Framework is organized into 4 domains, 12 criteria, and a 4-level rating scale.
Mandated statewide in Massachusetts for all public school districts.
Domains and Criteria
The Massachusetts Framework domains and criteria
Standard 1: Curriculum, Planning, and Assessment
Promoting the learning and growth of all students by providing high-quality and coherent instruction, designing and administering authentic assessments, and analyzing data to inform planning.
I-A: Curriculum and Planning
1. Subject Matter Knowledge: Demonstrates sound knowledge of the subject matter by: Using evidence-based pedagogical practices that enable all students to develop and apply grade-level knowledge and skills in relevant and real-world contexts. Supporting all students to make connections between the subject matter and real-world issues with impact on their communities and the world. 2. Knowledge of Students: Builds on and draws from knowledge of their students' identities, skills, developmental levels, cultures, languages, and communities to provide relevant and differentiated learning experiences that enable all students to develop and exercise social-emotional skills (e.g. self-management and making responsible decisions) and progress towards grade-level standards. 3. Curriculum Literacy: Skillfully uses curricular materials by: Determining strengths and weaknesses of materials and adapting as necessary to plan evidence-based, inclusive, and culturally sustaining instruction, including identifying opportunities to create meaningful, relevant connections rooted in the local context. Identifying necessary supplemental resources and/or tiered supports to provide all students access to grade-level instruction. Utilizing a coherent instructional approach that builds student learning towards grade-level standards and individual learning goals over time through aligned lesson goals, scope, sequence, and tasks.
I-B: Assessment
1. Purposeful Assessment: Uses a variety of formal and informal assessments for specific instructional purposes, including to: Understand each student's strengths and areas for growth. Measure and monitor all students' understanding throughout instruction and their progress toward grade-level standards and/or individual learning goals. Actively inform instructional decisions. 2. Accessible Assessment: Implements assessments that are accessible to all students by: Providing multiple ways and opportunities for students to demonstrate their learning. Creating opportunities for students to be able to draw from their cultural and linguistic knowledge and personal experiences. Ensuring that assessment tasks, methods and instruments maintain the rigor and high expectations outlined in the grade-level standards and do not perpetuate racial, cultural, or linguistic bias.
I-C: Analysis
1. Analysis and Conclusions: Analyzes disaggregated data from a wide range of assessments to: Gain information about students' progress towards grade-level standards and/or individual learning goals, including trends across students or student groups. Reflect on instruction and identify actions to reduce disparate outcomes and improve learning for all students. 2. Adjustments to Practice: Uses analysis and conclusions from a wide range of assessment data and feedback from colleagues, students, and families to adjust practice and implement differentiated and scaffolded supports for improved and more equitable student learning outcomes. 3. Sharing Progress with Students and Families: Collaborates with students and their families, in an accessible format and language, to: Communicate specific, timely, and asset-based feedback on student progress towards grade-level or proficiency standards. Identify ways to build on students' strengths and support further growth. 4. Sharing Progress with Colleagues: Collaborates with appropriate colleagues (e.g., special education teachers, English learner education teachers, paraeducators, general education teachers, and specialists) to: Share conclusions about student progress towards grade-level standards and/or individual learning goals to identify ways to build on students' strengths and support further growth. Seek feedback about instructional or assessment practices that will support student learning.
Standard 2: Teaching All Students
Promoting the learning and growth of all students through instructional practices that establish high expectations, create a safe learning environment, and promote student engagement.
II-A: Instruction
1. High Expectations and Support: Supports all students to meet or exceed high expectations for grade-appropriate, standards-aligned learning, produce high-quality work, and develop self-awareness and skills for independent learning by: Using evidence-based, culturally and linguistically sustaining instructional practices to provide equitable opportunities for grade-level learning. Providing flexible and responsive supports, scaffolds, and tools to meet students' needs. Communicating clear criteria for success (e.g., models, rubrics, exemplars). Reinforcing perseverance and effort with challenging content and tasks. 2. Engaging Instruction: Engages all students as active participants in learning experiences that are relevant, real-world, and interactive by: Providing opportunities for students to make choices, explore topics and apply learning in culturally and linguistically sustaining ways, and through real-world, interactive contexts. Building on students' strengths, interests, cultural and linguistic backgrounds, and prior knowledge to support and motivate learning. Facilitating purposeful student-to-student academic discourse with equitable student participation in discussion. Integrating digital tools and educational technology that enhance learning experiences and promote the development of digital literacy skills. 3. Inclusive Instruction: Accommodates and supports individual differences in all students' learning needs, abilities, interests, and levels of readiness, including those of students with disabilities (in accordance with relevant IEPs or 504 plans), English learners and former English learners, academically advanced students, and students who have been historically marginalized, by: Using appropriate inclusive practices, such as tiered supports, educational and assistive technologies, scaffolded instruction, and leveraging of students' native language and linguistic resources, to make grade-level content accessible and affirming for all students. Providing students with multiple ways to learn content and demonstrate understanding, as appropriate.
II-B: Learning Environment
1. Positive Relationships: Builds positive, caring relationships to help all students feel valued, respected, equitably supported, and a sense of belonging in the classroom community. 2. Safe Learning Environment: Creates and maintains a safe, supportive, and inclusive environment by: Establishing, with student input, classroom routines and systems to support student learning. Modeling and reinforcing respect for and affirmation of differences related to background, identity, language, strengths, and challenges (self- and social awareness). Supporting student accountability for the impact of their actions. Enabling students to take academic risks and share ideas freely. Seeking feedback from students on their experience of the classroom learning environment and making aligned adjustments to practice. 3. Collaborative Learning Environment: Develops students' relationship and communication skills by: Providing students with frequent opportunities to interact with peers, make sense of complex ideas together, and develop language. Supporting students to engage with differences and diverse perspectives, respectfully challenge each other's thinking, and address interpersonal conflicts as they arise. 4. Student Ownership of Learning: Guides students to self-assess, problem-solve, ask for support, access resources when needed, and demonstrate leadership and/or positively contribute to the classroom and school community. 5. Critical Thinking: Develops students' abilities to think critically, ask questions, and analyze sources, perspectives, and biases in order to deepen learning and make connections between the content and real-world problems and events (e.g., issues of identity, equity, power, and justice).
II-C: Student Learning
1. Academic Student Outcomes: Demonstrates expected impact on academic student outcomes based on multiple measures of student learning, growth, and achievement, including student progress on common assessments and statewide student growth measures where available. 2. Non-Academic Student Outcomes: Demonstrates expected impact on non-academic student outcomes, such as student engagement and sense of belonging, based on student feedback and local measures of engagement where available.
Standard 3: Family and Community Engagement
Promoting the learning and growth of all students through effective partnerships with families, caregivers, and the community.
III-A: Communication
1. Communication With Families: Establishes regular, two-way communication with families that: Is culturally and linguistically sustaining and aligned with family preferences, in language(s) that families understand, and in approachable language and formats. Shares timely information about student learning and performance.
III-B: Engagement
1. Family Engagement: Engages with families in a way that is equitable and collaborative by: Building positive relationships with families characterized by mutual trust and respect. Providing a variety of frequent, inclusive, and culturally and linguistically responsive opportunities for all families to engage as partners in the classroom community. Clearly and accessibly communicating information about family engagement opportunities.
III-C: Collaboration
1. Collaboration on Student Learning and Well-Being: Partners with families to support students' learning and well-being by: Leveraging families' cultural and linguistic knowledge and expertise as assets. Engaging with families about what students are learning in the classroom and expectations for student success. Collaboratively identifying, and seeking family input on, strategies and resources for supporting student learning and growth in and out of school.
Standard 4: Professional Culture
Promoting the learning and growth of all students through ethical practice, continuous professional development, leadership, and collaboration.
IV-A: Reflective Practice and Professional Growth
1. Reflective Practice: Reflects on the effectiveness of instruction and how one's identities, biases, and practices impact student learning and well-being; and works to improve practice and eliminate learning inequities across race, gender, ethnicity, language, disability and ability, and other aspects of student identities, such that all students can meet or exceed grade-level standards. 2. Goal-Setting: Sets professional practice and student learning goals that: Are challenging, standards-aligned and measurable. Are based on thorough self-assessment, analysis of student learning data, and feedback from students and families. Promote more inclusive and equitable learning experiences and outcomes for all students. 3. Professional Learning and Growth: Seeks out and engages in ongoing cycles of professional learning to strengthen equitable practice and improve student learning, applies new knowledge and skills into practice, and monitors impact on student outcomes.
IV-B: Shared Responsibility, Collaboration, and Decision-Making
1. Shared Responsibility: Shares responsibility for schoolwide culture and learning expectations that promote an equitable and culturally and linguistically sustaining school community. 2. Professional Collaboration: Collaborates and communicates with colleagues, including special education, paraeducators, English learner education, general education, specialists, and support staff, on tasks in support of shared goals for student learning such as adapting and implementing instructional materials, examining student work, analyzing student performance, and planning appropriate scaffolds, interventions, and supports. 3. Decision-Making: Contributes ideas and expertise to planning and decision making at the school, department, and/or grade level to advance effective, equitable, inclusive and digitally appropriate instruction for all students.
IV-C: Professional Responsibilities
1. Judgment: Adheres to the school or district's existing code of ethics and protects student confidentiality appropriately, including student data privacy related to digital tools. 2. Professional Responsibilities: Fulfills all routine professional responsibilities, including: Performing duties of the role in accordance with school and district guidelines. Connecting students to needed academic and social-emotional supports as available. Engaging with all colleagues with respect and civility. Adhering to district attendance policies.
Rating Levels
Massachusetts Framework rating levels
Unsatisfactory
The educator's performance is consistently below the requirements and has not shown improvement.
Needs Improvement
The educator's performance is below the requirements but not considered to be Unsatisfactory at this time. Improvement is necessary and expected.
Proficient
The educator's performance fully meets the requirements. This is the expected, rigorous yet attainable level of performance for most educators.
Exemplary
The educator's performance exceeds requirements and consistently demonstrates high-quality practice with impact in the classroom or beyond.
Source
Official Massachusetts Framework source
Source: Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Model Rubric for Classroom Teacher Evaluation - Updated June 2024 (June 2024). Verified 2026-06-01. View the official rubric
Rubric facts verified 2026-06-01 against the official source.
Giving feedback on the Massachusetts Framework
The slow part is the write-up
Aligning observation evidence to every Massachusetts Framework domain and standard by hand, for every teacher and every visit, is what eats a principal's week. Observation Copilot does that mapping for you.
How Observation Copilot Helps
AI-powered Massachusetts Framework feedback in seconds
Paste your observation notes. Copilot maps your evidence to the right Massachusetts Framework domains and drafts structured, rubric-aligned feedback - ready to review and share. Walkthrough notes return a focused single-indicator debrief; full lesson observations return a multi-domain rubric-aligned report.
- Organizes observation notes by the four Massachusetts educator standards
- Generates evidence-based feedback aligned to the state performance rubric
- Suggests performance ratings based on observed evidence across the four-level scale
- Creates targeted next steps tied to specific Massachusetts framework indicators
- Reduces post-observation write-up time for Massachusetts principals
Frequently Asked Questions
Massachusetts Framework FAQ
- What is the Massachusetts Framework?
- Massachusetts statewide classroom teacher evaluation rubric assessing practice across four Standards of Teaching at four performance levels, used within the state's educator evaluation system.
- What are the domains of the Massachusetts Framework?
- The Massachusetts Framework is organized into 4 domains: Standard 1: Curriculum, Planning, and Assessment, Standard 2: Teaching All Students, Standard 3: Family and Community Engagement, and Standard 4: Professional Culture.
- How is the Massachusetts Framework scored?
- Performance is rated on a 4-level scale: Unsatisfactory, Needs Improvement, Proficient, and Exemplary.
- Which version of the Massachusetts teacher rubric is current?
- The current rubric is the Model Rubric for Classroom Teacher Evaluation (updated June 2024) from the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, verified against the official source on June 1, 2026.
Used In
States Using Massachusetts Framework
Related Reading
Massachusetts Framework Resources for Principals
50 Teacher Observation Feedback Examples (Organized by Framework Domain)
50 specific teacher observation feedback examples organized by framework domain, each tied to evidence and a next step principals can use.
Read more
FFT, T-TESS, Marzano, or Your Own: How Observation Copilot Aligns to Any Framework
Whether you use Danielson FFT, T-TESS, Marzano, or a custom rubric, Observation Copilot aligns feedback to your framework.
Read more
Walkthroughs vs. Formal Observations: When Each One Helps and When It Hurts
Walkthroughs and formal observations serve different purposes. Here's how principals balance both in a coaching cycle that actually grows teachers.
Read more
Writing Better Observation Notes: Tips for Getting the Most Out of AI-Powered Feedback
AI-generated feedback is only as good as your observation notes. Practical tips for writing notes that produce better, more specific results.
Read more
The Post-Observation Conversation: How to Make the 15 Minutes After Feedback Count
Delivering feedback is only half the job. Here's how to structure the post-observation conversation so teachers grow from it.
Read more
Ready to streamline your Massachusetts Framework observations?
Start generating framework-aligned feedback in seconds.
